a foundation model for the Moon

Moonstone: A Multimodal Foundation Model & Benchmark for Lunar Remote Sensing

A 28-channel global dataset from five lunar missions, a modality-grouped masked autoencoder that learns across instruments, and a six-task benchmark for machine learning on the Moon.

Ayush Prasad  ·  Swarnalee Mazumder

Finnish Meteorological Institute  ·  German Climate Computing Centre

To appear at ECCV 2026

Overview

Half a century of orbital missions have imaged the Moon in optical, spectral, thermal, radar, gravity, and elemental data, yet those archives stay fragmented and no benchmark exists for machine learning on them. Moonstone brings them together as one 28-channel global dataset, trains MG-MAE (a modality-grouped masked autoencoder that reads across instruments and handles missing coverage), and evaluates it on six downstream tasks. Pretrained MG-MAE features beat from-scratch, ImageNet, and vanilla-MAE baselines on every task.

28
channels
7
modality groups
5
lunar missions
6
benchmark tasks

Dataset

One place on the Moon, seven ways of seeing it

Every instrument is reprojected onto the same 128 pixels-per-degree grid (46,080 × 23,040, ~237 m/pixel) and tiled into 256 × 256 patches, so a single lunar coordinate carries 28 co-registered measurements. Pick a modality to see the same terrain through a different instrument.

SurfaceLRO WAC · LOLA · SLDEM
ModalityCoverageCh.

WAC morphology · elevation · slope · roughness

28 channels · 7 modalities · bar height shows surface coverage
Surface 100%
Thermal 70%
Spectral 67%
Gravity 100%
Radar 17%
Hapke 78%
Composition 99%

Every column is one modality group, split into its individual channels. A missing instrument (radar covers only 16% of the surface) is handled as signal, not error.

Model · MG-MAE

Reconstruct the Moon from a quarter of the pixels

MG-MAE groups the 28 channels into seven modalities, tokenizes each with its own convolutional stem, and encodes them with a shared Vision Transformer. Coverage-adaptive masking hides most of every patch, heavily for common modalities and gently for rare ones, and a per-group decoder fills the gaps. Pick a modality below: given only 25% of the tiles, the model recovers coherent structure, cleanly for a smooth gravity field, and impressively for cratered terrain.

Masked input · 25% visibleMG-MAE reconstructionGround truth
Masked input MG-MAE reconstruction Ground truth

Grouped tokenizers let the encoder learn structure within a modality, such as the shape of a reflectance spectrum or the falloff of a gravity anomaly, while cross-modal attention lets one instrument inform another. A spectral-continuity term keeps the eight hyperspectral bands physically smooth.

Benchmark

Six downstream tasks

Pretrained features are evaluated against a from-scratch encoder, frozen ImageNet features, and a vanilla per-channel MAE, via linear probing and fine-tuning. MG-MAE wins on every task, with the largest gains on geology (+16.2% accuracy) and craters (+14.7 mIoU).

Task Metric ImageNet Scratch V. MAE MG-MAE lin. MG-MAE ft.
Geology Acc 33.2 40.1 44.8 52.4 56.3
Age Acc 50.4 58.7 63.5 69.8 73.2
Composition .631 .802 .871 .924 .908
Cross-modal .812 .941 .956 .971 .987
Craters mIoU .542 .621 .668 .698 .768
Mare mIoU .867 .901 .912 .928 .936
Higher is better.Bold = best per task.Shaded = MG-MAE (ours).
Data-efficiency curves: MG-MAE linear-probe vs from-scratch across labeling budgets on six tasks.
Data efficiency. MG-MAE linear-probe features stay ahead of training from scratch across labeling budgets, with the largest advantage in the low-data regime, where lunar ground truth is scarcest.

Open release

Citation

@article{prasad2026moonstone,
  title         = {Moonstone: A Multimodal Foundation Model and Benchmark
                   for Lunar Remote Sensing},
  author        = {Prasad, Ayush and Mazumder, Swarnalee},
  journal       = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.03644},
  year          = {2026}
}