Overview
Half a century of orbital missions have imaged the Moon in optical, spectral, thermal, radar, gravity, and elemental data, yet those archives stay fragmented and no benchmark exists for machine learning on them. Moonstone brings them together as one 28-channel global dataset, trains MG-MAE (a modality-grouped masked autoencoder that reads across instruments and handles missing coverage), and evaluates it on six downstream tasks. Pretrained MG-MAE features beat from-scratch, ImageNet, and vanilla-MAE baselines on every task.
Dataset
One place on the Moon, seven ways of seeing it
Every instrument is reprojected onto the same 128 pixels-per-degree grid (46,080 × 23,040, ~237 m/pixel) and tiled into 256 × 256 patches, so a single lunar coordinate carries 28 co-registered measurements. Pick a modality to see the same terrain through a different instrument.
WAC morphology · elevation · slope · roughness
Every column is one modality group, split into its individual channels. A missing instrument (radar covers only 16% of the surface) is handled as signal, not error.
Model · MG-MAE
Reconstruct the Moon from a quarter of the pixels
MG-MAE groups the 28 channels into seven modalities, tokenizes each with its own convolutional stem, and encodes them with a shared Vision Transformer. Coverage-adaptive masking hides most of every patch, heavily for common modalities and gently for rare ones, and a per-group decoder fills the gaps. Pick a modality below: given only 25% of the tiles, the model recovers coherent structure, cleanly for a smooth gravity field, and impressively for cratered terrain.
Grouped tokenizers let the encoder learn structure within a modality, such as the shape of a reflectance spectrum or the falloff of a gravity anomaly, while cross-modal attention lets one instrument inform another. A spectral-continuity term keeps the eight hyperspectral bands physically smooth.
Benchmark
Six downstream tasks
Pretrained features are evaluated against a from-scratch encoder, frozen ImageNet features, and a vanilla per-channel MAE, via linear probing and fine-tuning. MG-MAE wins on every task, with the largest gains on geology (+16.2% accuracy) and craters (+14.7 mIoU).
| Task | Metric | ImageNet | Scratch | V. MAE | MG-MAE lin. | MG-MAE ft. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geology | Acc | 33.2 | 40.1 | 44.8 | 52.4 | 56.3 |
| Age | Acc | 50.4 | 58.7 | 63.5 | 69.8 | 73.2 |
| Composition | R² | .631 | .802 | .871 | .924 | .908 |
| Cross-modal | R² | .812 | .941 | .956 | .971 | .987 |
| Craters | mIoU | .542 | .621 | .668 | .698 | .768 |
| Mare | mIoU | .867 | .901 | .912 | .928 | .936 |
Open release
Citation
@article{prasad2026moonstone,
title = {Moonstone: A Multimodal Foundation Model and Benchmark
for Lunar Remote Sensing},
author = {Prasad, Ayush and Mazumder, Swarnalee},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.03644},
year = {2026}
}